Kia sorento vs opel antara
Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It’s only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the suv segment and utilize the same 5-door suv body style and the 4 x 4 wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. The first one has a Hyundai-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 248hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 230hp engine designed by General Motors.
The fact that the KIA got tested by the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), while the other contender didn’t, offers a slight advantage, as the 4-star rating is better than none. That aside, let’s consider some other aspects which affect safety. Both vehicles belong to the suv segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, but it doesn’t do much to help us decide between the two. Furthermore, if we’d like to consider vehicle mass in this context too, which we definitely should, the Korean car offers a marginal difference of 8% more metal.
Reliability
Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, at least on all of the models level. That’s the official data, while our visitors describe reliability of KIA with an average rating of 4.6, and models under the Opel badge with 4.2 out of 5. The same official information place Sorento as average reliability-wise, and Antara is more or less at the same level.Above it all, drivers of cars with the same engine as the Korean car rank it on average as 4.0, while the one under the competitor’s bonnet gets 5.0 out of 5.
Performance & Fuel economy
Opel is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in 0.4 seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 203 kilometers per hour, 13km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be the Korean car, averaging around 10.8 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (26 mpg), in combined cycle. We can’t ignore that 7% difference compared to the German car.
Opel appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the Korean car beats the other contender by far, making it the best choice without even considering other things. From there things take a different direction, with Opel offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. It does come at a cost though, and that’s the fuel consumption. All together, there’s not much more to say, in this case I wouldn’t even consider anything but KIA. In any case that’s my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you’ll find my guidelines useful in the process. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, out of 12.000+ vehicles we currently have in our database.
Kia sorento vs opel antara
Присматриваюсь вот к Опельку Антара 2,2 (184) дизель. Цена приемлимая( 1300000 в полном фарше), внешний вид приемлим , клиренс тоже (200), может кто тестил, глядел. Ваши мнения( или мнения Ваших друзей)
Да, багажничек поменьше поменьше 1420 против2050 у семиместного.. но это для чего и кому ,колёсная база однотипная, по движке характеристики похожие. по массе опель даже потяжелее будет( вот засчёт чего только?)юпо длине почти одинаковые, по ширине Сорик на 3 см пошире.
а на 19 дисках ваабще и посолиднее. ( в комплектухе идут)
докторишка   Партнёр Клуба Сообщения: 4842 Зарегистрирован: 21 янв 2009, 17:41 Благодарил (а): 310 раз. Поблагодарили: 280 раз. Имя: Сергей Автомобиль: Другая машина Год выпуска: 2016
Re: Sorento R vs Opel Antara
Машинака неплохая., но по сравнению с Соренто в Антаре будет грустно.
Единственно, если двигатель 3.2 то будет одно утешение — динамика.
Про дизель 2.2 — не скажу, но по идее должен быть поприеместей чем Киа 2.4Ат. Наверно такой же как и наш 2.2 дизель
А так Дэу — хоть как его переделай и обзови, лучше Кии не станет.
И чувство что едешь на Дэу потом будет постоянно преследовать.
IRET   Сообщения: 161 Зарегистрирован: 24 апр 2013, 11:15 Откуда: Новочеркасск Благодарил (а): 11 раз. Поблагодарили: 9 раз. Автомобиль: Sorento XM, 2.4 (174 л/с), 4WD, AT Год выпуска: 2011
Re: Sorento R vs Opel Antara
У соседа по гаражу такой. От переднего бампера до асфальта 150-160мм, Дизель тарахтит просто жуть, соседу аж стыдно. По динамике пробовали с места до 90, мой чипованый, сосед, ну может пол корпуса выиграл. Дизайн опелевский на любителя, в остальном обрезанная Captiva. Да, цена Antara 2.2D (184 л.с.) 6AT от 1,248,000 руб — очень привлекательна.
Владимирыч   Сообщения: 618 Зарегистрирован: 27 июн 2010, 00:48 Откуда: Ярославль Благодарил (а): 12 раз. Поблагодарили: 16 раз. Имя: Илья Автомобиль: Sorento XM, 2.4 (174 л/с), 4WD, AT Год выпуска: 2010 Доп. информация: Bright Silver,
чипован Paulus, Пружины H&R (VladSprings снял), амо сзади — Koni 8240-1215
Re: Sorento R vs Opel Antara
Надо будет на тест драйв записаться.
вроде с дэу ничего общего:
Расположение производства
Производственные мощности Adam Opel AG (Германия)
Германия: Рюссельсхайм 1898
Astra
Insignia
15600
Германия: Бохум 1962
Zafira
4800
Германия: Кайзерслаутерн 1966
Моторы
3100
Германия: Айзенах 1990
Corsa
1700
Производственные мощности Adam Opel AG (Европа)
Бельгия: Антверпен 1924
Моторы
0
Великобритания: Эллесмер Порт 1962
Astra
Astra J Sports Tourer
2117
Испания: Сарагоса 1982
Corsa
Meriva
5670
Австрия: Вена 1982
Моторы
Трансмиссии
1800
Венгрия: Сентготтхард 1990
Моторы
Трансмиссии
620
Польша: Гливице 1998
Astra
3000
Россия: Шушары 2008
Antara
Astra J
1200
Производственные мощности для крупноузловой сборки
Россия: Калининград 2010
Astra J Sports Tourer
Astra H
Insignia
Zafira
?
Производственные мощности сторонних компаний
Турция: Бурса (Tofaş) 1968
Combo
8200
Франция: Батийи (Renault) 1980
Movano
0
Венгрия: Эстергом (Suzuki) 1991
Agila
6300
докторишка   Партнёр Клуба Сообщения: 4842 Зарегистрирован: 21 янв 2009, 17:41 Благодарил (а): 310 раз. Поблагодарили: 280 раз. Имя: Сергей Автомобиль: Другая машина Год выпуска: 2016
Re: Sorento R vs Opel Antara
Опель Антара и Шевроле каптива собираются на одних и тех же заводах.
У них абсолютно одна платформа, разработанная инженерами ДЭУ.
В Корее автомобиль выпускается по маркой Daewoo Winstorm.
Причем эти два кузова (Антара и Капитва) в разных странах продаются под разными названиями.
Где то Анатра — это шевроле. где то каптива это дэу , где то дэу — это антара.
т.е. все в перемешку. Но суть одна — изначально это ДЭУ.
IRET   Сообщения: 161 Зарегистрирован: 24 апр 2013, 11:15 Откуда: Новочеркасск Благодарил (а): 11 раз. Поблагодарили: 9 раз. Автомобиль: Sorento XM, 2.4 (174 л/с), 4WD, AT Год выпуска: 2011
Re: Sorento R vs Opel Antara
Razorblade   Сообщения: 143 Зарегистрирован: 11 окт 2011, 08:48 Откуда: Москва Благодарил (а): 2 раз. Поблагодарили: 0 раз. Автомобиль: Sorento XM, 2.4 (174 л/с), 4WD, AT Год выпуска: 2013
Кто сейчас на конференции
Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 1
Kia sorento vs opel antara
Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It’s only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the suv segment and utilize the same 5-door suv body style and the 4 x 4 wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. The first one has a Hyundai-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 175hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 167hp engine designed by General Motors.
The fact that the KIA got tested by the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), while the other contender didn’t, puts it sky-high safety-wise, in my eyes at least. Still, apart from the official crash test results there are other things we need to be aware of. Both vehicles belong to the suv segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, but it doesn’t do much to help us decide between the two. On the other hand, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, the German car offers a marginal difference of 3% more metal.
Reliability
I don’t like generalizing things when it comes to reliability, although it does seem that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, all the models observed together. That’s the official data, while our visitors describe reliability of KIA with an average rating of 4.6, and models under the Opel badge with 4.2 out of 5. Unfortunatelly, I don’t have enough insight that would allow me to comment in more details on the specific models level. We should definitely mention that owners of cars with the same powertrain as the Korean car rank it on average as 5.0, while the one under the competitor’s bonnet gets 2.0 out of 5.
Performance & Fuel economy
Opel is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in 0.2 seconds less than its competitor. Still, it lacks the power to win the top speed competition, topping at 186 kilometers per hour, 4km/h less than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around 8.9 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (32 mpg), in combined cycle.
KIA is apparently more reliable, not too much, but just enough. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the Korean car beats the other contender by far, making it the best choice without even considering other things. From there things take a different direction, with Opel offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. It does come at a cost though, and that’s the fuel consumption. All together, there’s not much more to say, in this case I wouldn’t even consider anything but KIA. Anyway, that’s the most objective conclusion I could’ve came up with and it’s based solely on the information found on this website. Aspects such as design, practicality, brand value and driving experience are there for you to measure them out. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles.