- Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 Comparison
- Overview: Ranger vs Mazda BT-50
- Key Features
- Best Loan Offers
- Photo Comparision
- User Ratings & Review Comparison
- From The Experts
- Dimensions & Capacity
- Engine Details
- Performance
- Steering
- Suspension & Brakes
- Transmission
- Wheel & Tyre
- Safety
- Security
- Comfort & Convenience
- Entertainment & Communication
- Instrumentation
- Seats & Upholstery
- Exterior
- Interior
- Compare Ford Ranger With Similar Cars
- Compare Mazda BT-50 With Similar Cars
- Cars Comparisons By Experts
- Used Ford Cars Price
- Used Mazda Cars Price
- Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 FAQs
- Which Car is cheaper between Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50?
- Which Car has more power between Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50?
- Which Car has more safety features between Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50?
- Which Car has more comfort features between Ranger vs BT-50?
- Which Car has Higher ground clearance between Ranger vs BT-50?
- What is Ranger vs BT-50 dimension size comparison?
- From The Experts
Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 Comparison
The detailed Cars comparison of Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50, based on price, specifications & other features is shown below. The Ford Ranger priced at RM 98,888 while the Mazda BT-50 Cars has a price tag of RM 92,000 . Comparing the technical specifications, Mazda BT-50 engine displacement is 1898 while the Ford Ranger houses a 1996 engine.
Overview: Ranger vs Mazda BT-50
Key Features
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Seating Capacity | 5 Seats | 5 Seats |
Power | 207 hp | 188 hp |
Engine Displacement | 1996 cc | 2999 cc |
Best Loan Offers
Photo Comparision
User Ratings & Review Comparison
The car has a nice design but the finishing is horrible, I drive a 2017 Ford Ranger and the outside rubbers from the windows are all gone, the chrome. Read More
I have owned the Mazda BT-50 for the last three years, and it has proven to be a versatile and dependable vehicle. I earlier wanted to purchase the. Read More
From The Experts
Ford, being one of the pioneers in making lifestyle premium pickup trucks, definitely knows a thing or two in making good looking pickup trucks. The Ranger, with its all American brute looks, indeed looks macho and muscular, especially at the front. The frontal looks shared with the Ford Everest SUV looks intimidating.
In addition to the exterior design, even the interior cabin of the Ford Ranger feels plush and solidly built. While the instrument console in the Ford Ranger feels quite comprehensive and futuristic, the presence of some of the premium features shared with the Ford Everest indeed makes the Ford Ranger a happy place to be in.
A pickup truck deserves a powerful heart to give it a go anywhere ability, and the Ford Ranger is blessed with one. Powered by a 2.2-litre diesel engine shared with the Everest, the Ranger feels mighty on road with an adequate punch to go on and off the road with equal prowess – something which is assisted by the fantastic four wheel drive as well.
While the engine surprises you with the amount of power it packs in, the levels of refinement, especially in the higher rpms. The engine sounds noisy and gruffy, which despite having a good sound insulation system, makes its presence felt inside the cabin with its loudness.
Being a pickup truck with quite a high ground clearance, the Ford Ranger has not that great and plush ride quality. The suspension is good enough to eat up all the undulations on the tarmac with ease, however, it is not plush to keep the inner occupants comfortable.
Dimensions & Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity (litres) | 80 L | 76 L |
Front Tread | 1620 mm | — |
Rear Tread | 1620 mm | — |
Kerb Weight | 2060 kg | 1800 kg |
Gross Weight | 3230 kg | 2800 kg |
Length | 5431 mm | 5320 mm |
Width | 1918 mm | 1810 mm |
Height | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheel Base | 3270 mm | 3125 mm |
Ground Clearance | 230 mm | 220 mm |
Turning Radius | 6.45 m | — |
No Of Doors | 2 | 2 |
Seating Capacity | 2 Seats | 2 Seats |
Payload Capacity | — | 1000 kg |
Wading Depth | — | 400 mm |
View All
Engine Details
Engine | 2.0L Diesel Engine, 4 Cylinder 16 Valve | 1.9L Diesel Engine, In-line 4 Cylinder 16 Valve DOHC |
Fuel Supply System | CRDi | CRDi |
No Of Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
Valve Configuration | — | DOHC |
Emission Norm Compliance | — | Euro 2 |
View All
Performance
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Engine Displacement | 1996 cc | 1898 cc |
Power | 168 hp | 148 hp |
Torque | 405 Nm | 350 Nm |
RPM At Max Power | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
RPM At Max Torque | 1750-2500 RPM | 1800-2600 RPM |
View All
Steering
Power Steering | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable Steering Column | Yes | Yes |
Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
Steering Type | Electric Power | Hydraulic Power |
Steering Gear Type | Rack & Pinion | Rack & Pinion |
Suspension & Brakes
Front Brake Type | Ventilated Discs | Ventilated Discs |
Rear Brake Type | Drum | Drums |
Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone |
Rear Suspension | Leaf spring | Leaf Springs |
Shock Absorbers Type | Coil Spring | — |
Transmission
Wheel & Tyre
Alloy Wheels | Yes | No |
Wheel Covers | No | Yes |
Alloy Wheel Size | 16 Inch | 16 Inch |
Tyre Size | 255/70 R16 | 205/55 R16 |
Tyre Type | Radial | Radial |
Wheel Size | — | R16 |
Spare Tyre Size | — | 205/55 R16 |
Spare Tyre Material | — | Steel |
View All
Safety
Anti-Lock Braking System | Yes | Yes |
Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
Ebd | Yes | Yes |
Vehicle Stability Control System | Yes | Yes |
Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
Crash Sensor | Yes | Yes |
Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
Side Airbag-Front | No | No |
Side Airbag-Rear | No | No |
Door Ajar Warning | Yes | Yes |
Seat Belt Warning | Yes | Yes |
Rear Seat Belts | No | No |
Child Safety Locks | No | No |
ISOFIX Child Seat Mounts | No | No |
Day & Night Rear View Mirror | Yes | Yes |
Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
Hill-Start Assist Control | Yes | Yes |
Downhill Assist Control | Yes | Yes |
Side Impact Beams | Yes | Yes |
Engine Check Warning | Yes | Yes |
Curtain Airbags | — | No |
Knee Airbags | — | No |
Front Parking Sensors | — | No |
Rear Parking Sensors | — | No |
Rear Camera | — | No |
Emergency Stop Signal | — | Yes |
Park Assist | — | No |
Front Impact Beams | — | Yes |
Electric Parking Brake | — | No |
Blind Spot monitor | — | No |
Lane Departure Warning System | — | No |
Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | No |
View All
Security
Central Locking | Yes | — |
Power Door Locks | Yes | Yes |
Anti Theft Device | Yes | Yes |
Anti-Theft Alarm | Yes | No |
Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioner | Yes | Yes |
Automatic Climate Control | No | No |
Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
Heater | Yes | Yes |
Accessory Power Outlet | Yes | Yes |
Central Console Armrest | Yes | — |
Bottle Holder | Yes | Yes |
Cup Holders-Front | Yes | Yes |
Cup Holders-Rear | No | No |
Keyless Entry | Yes | No |
Power Windows Front | Yes | Yes |
Power Windows Rear | No | No |
Rear Reading Lamp | No | No |
Automatic Headlamps | No | Yes |
Glove Box Cooling | — | No |
Ventilated Front Seats | — | No |
Ventilated Rear Seats | — | No |
Engine Start/Stop Button | — | No |
Cruise Control | — | No |
Adaptive Cruise Control | — | No |
Follow Me Home Headlamps | — | No |
Memory Seats | — | No |
Head-Up Display | — | No |
Wireless Charger | — | No |
View All
Entertainment & Communication
Apple Carplay/Android Auto | Yes | No |
USB & Auxiliary Input | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
FM/AM/Radio | Yes | Yes |
Speakers Front | Yes | Yes |
Speakers Rear | No | No |
Multi-function Steering Wheel | Yes | No |
Integrated 2DIN Audio | No | Yes |
Voice Control | Yes | — |
Touch Screen | Yes | No |
CD Player | — | Yes |
No Of Speakers | — | 2 2 |
View All
Instrumentation
Low Fuel Warning Light | Yes | Yes |
Digital Clock | Yes | — |
Tacho Meter | Yes | Yes |
Electronic Multi Tripmeter | Yes | Yes |
Seats & Upholstery
Adjustable Seats | Yes | Yes |
Height Adjustable Driver Seat | Yes | Yes |
Electric Adjustable Seats | No | No |
Heated Seats — Rear | No | No |
Rear Seat Headrest | No | No |
Rear Seat Center Arm Rest | No | No |
Leather Steering Wheel | Yes | No |
Folding Table Rear | No | No |
Foldable Rear Seat | No | No |
Seat Upholstery | Fabric Fabric | — |
Seat Lumbar Support | — | No |
Heated Seats — Front | — | No |
Fabric Upholstery | — | Yes |
Leather Seats | — | No |
View All
Exterior
Electric Folding Rear View Mirror | No | Yes |
Manually Adjustable Exterior Rear View Mirror | No | Yes |
Power Adjustable Exterior Rear View Mirror | Yes | No |
Outside Rear View Mirror Turn Indicator | Yes | No |
Integrated Antenna | Yes | Yes |
Power Antenna | No | No |
Rain Sensing Wiper | No | Yes |
Rear Window Wiper | No | No |
Rear Window Washer | No | No |
Rear Window Defogger | Yes | — |
Adjustable Headlights | Yes | Yes |
Headlamp Type | Halogen Halogen | LED LED |
Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Taillight Type | Bulb Bulb | Bulb Bulb |
Fog Lights Front | Yes | Yes |
Fog Lights Rear | Yes | Yes |
Moon Roof | No | — |
Removable Convertible Top | No | No |
Side Stepper | Yes | No |
Centrally Mounted Fuel Tank | Yes | Yes |
Headlamps Washer | — | No |
Roof Rail | — | No |
View All
Interior
Compare Ford Ranger With Similar Cars
Compare Mazda BT-50 With Similar Cars
Cars Comparisons By Experts
It was only recently that Peugeot Malaysia added a new vehicle to its lineup, the Landtrek pickup. With its arrival. Read More
Pick-up vehicles have come a long way, haven’t they? Especially in the Malaysian market. Gone are the days when these. Read More
Used Ford Cars Price
- Johor Bahru
- Kuala Lumpur
- Kuching
- Alor Setar
- Used Cars Under Rm 20,000
- Used Cars Under Rm 30,000
- Used Cars Under Rm 50,000
- Used Cars Under Rm 100,000
Used Mazda Cars Price
- Johor Bahru
- Kuala Lumpur
- Kuching
- Alor Setar
- Used Cars Under Rm 20,000
- Used Cars Under Rm 30,000
- Used Cars Under Rm 50,000
- Used Cars Under Rm 100,000
Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50 FAQs
Which Car is cheaper between Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50?
Ranger is priced at RM 98,888 and BT-50 is priced at RM 92,000 . Hence BT-50 is the cheapest amongst these cars.
Which Car has more power between Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50?
The Ford Ranger has power of 168 hp with 405 Nm torque and Mazda BT-50 has power of 148 hp with 350 Nm torque. Thus making Ranger the more powerful as compared to BT-50.
Which Car has more safety features between Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50?
Ranger safety features: Anti-Lock Braking System, Brake Assist, Ebd, Vehicle Stability Control System, Traction Control, Crash Sensor, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Door Ajar Warning, Seat Belt Warning, Day & Night Rear View Mirror, Parking Sensors, Hill-Start Assist Control, Downhill Assist Control, Side Impact Beams and Engine Check Warning BT-50 safety features: Anti-Lock Braking System, Brake Assist, Ebd, Vehicle Stability Control System, Traction Control, Crash Sensor, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Door Ajar Warning, Seat Belt Warning, Day & Night Rear View Mirror, Emergency Stop Signal, Hill-Start Assist Control, Downhill Assist Control, Front Impact Beams, Side Impact Beams and Engine Check Warning The Mazda BT-50 has higher number of sefety features than Ranger, hence Mazda BT-50 is more safer than Ford Ranger.
Which Car has more comfort features between Ranger vs BT-50?
Ranger comfort features: Air Conditioner, Heater, Accessory Power Outlet, Central Console Armrest, Bottle Holder, Cup Holders-Front, Keyless Entry and Power Windows Front BT-50 comfort features: Air Conditioner, Heater, Accessory Power Outlet, Bottle Holder, Cup Holders-Front, Power Windows Front and Automatic Headlamps The Ford Ranger has higher number of comfort features than BT-50, hence Ford Ranger is more comfortable than Mazda BT-50.
Which Car has Higher ground clearance between Ranger vs BT-50?
The Ranger comes with a ground clearance of 230 mm , on the other hand the BT-50 comes with a ground clearance of 220 mm , hence the Ford Ranger has better ground clearence and off roading capabilities.
What is Ranger vs BT-50 dimension size comparison?
The Ranger dimension are 5431 mm length, 1918 mm width, 1890 mm height while the BT-50 Dimensions are 5320 mm length, 1810 mm width, 1770 mm height. Hence the Ranger is more longer more wider and more higher.
From The Experts
Ford, being one of the pioneers in making lifestyle premium pickup trucks, definitely knows a thing or two in making good looking pickup trucks. The Ranger, with its all American brute looks, indeed looks macho and muscular, especially at the front. The frontal looks shared with the Ford Everest SUV looks intimidating.
In addition to the exterior design, even the interior cabin of the Ford Ranger feels plush and solidly built. While the instrument console in the Ford Ranger feels quite comprehensive and futuristic, the presence of some of the premium features shared with the Ford Everest indeed makes the Ford Ranger a happy place to be in.
A pickup truck deserves a powerful heart to give it a go anywhere ability, and the Ford Ranger is blessed with one. Powered by a 2.2-litre diesel engine shared with the Everest, the Ranger feels mighty on road with an adequate punch to go on and off the road with equal prowess – something which is assisted by the fantastic four wheel drive as well.
While the engine surprises you with the amount of power it packs in, the levels of refinement, especially in the higher rpms. The engine sounds noisy and gruffy, which despite having a good sound insulation system, makes its presence felt inside the cabin with its loudness.
Being a pickup truck with quite a high ground clearance, the Ford Ranger has not that great and plush ride quality. The suspension is good enough to eat up all the undulations on the tarmac with ease, however, it is not plush to keep the inner occupants comfortable.