Chevrolet captiva gmc terrain

Chevrolet Captiva Sport vs. GMC Terrain

When we compare the Chevrolet Captiva Sport’s and the GMC Terrain’s specifications and ratings, the Chevrolet Captiva Sport has the advantage in the area of typical lower range of pricing for one- to five-year-old used cars. The GMC Terrain has the advantage in the areas of fuel efficiency, interior volume and base engine power. Based on this comparison of the Chevrolet Captiva Sport’s and the GMC Terrain’s specifications and ratings, the GMC Terrain is a better car than the Chevrolet Captiva Sport.

Chevrolet Captiva Sport vs. GMC Terrain Pricing

A used 2015 Chevrolet Captiva Sport ranges from $6,971 to $16,999 while a used 2015 GMC Terrain is priced between $9,499 to $19,990.

Engine Power and Fuel Efficiency Comparison

For engine performance, the Chevrolet Captiva Sport’s base engine makes 180 horsepower, and the GMC Terrain base engine makes 182 horsepower. The Captiva Sport is rated to deliver an average of 23 miles per gallon, with a highway range of 532 miles. The Terrain is rated to deliver an average of 26 miles per gallon, with a highway range of 576 miles. This gives the GMC Terrain the fuel efficiency and maximum range advantage over the Chevrolet Captiva Sport. Both models use gasoline.

Passenger Space Comparison

The GMC Terrain has the advantage of offering more interior volume, reflected in more front leg room, rear leg room, and cargo space. The Chevrolet Captiva Sport has the advantage in the areas of front head room, front shoulder room, rear head room and rear shoulder room.

Safety Ratings Comparison

The GMC Terrain has an average safety rating of 5 out of 5 Stars based on NHTSA’s crash test ratings.

Источник

Chevrolet Captiva Клуб

kaRRamba Майор
Сообщения: 911 Зарегистрирован: 02 мар 2013, 18:33 Город: СПб, север

Chevrolet Captiva vs GMC Terrain

Сообщение kaRRamba » 08 фев 2014, 20:31

kaRRamba Майор
Сообщения: 911 Зарегистрирован: 02 мар 2013, 18:33 Город: СПб, север

Сообщение kaRRamba » 08 фев 2014, 20:32

С осени 2009 года в Северной Америке начались продажи нового среднеразмерного люксового кроссовера GMC Terrain, созданного на модернизированной платформе Theta (собственная разработка GM), ее так же используют для кроссовера Opel Antara. Собирают новинку в Инжерсолле (Канада, Онтарио) параллельно с одноплатформенным Chevrolet Equinox. Усиленный несущий кузов, поперечное расположение двигателя, передний или автоматически подключаемый полный привод за доплату. Габаритные размеры — 4705x1850x1684 мм, колесная база 2857 мм. Двигатели — бензиновые объемом 2,4 л R4 16V, WT (182 л.с. 233 Н-м) или 3,0 л V6 24V, VVT (264 л.с., 301 Н-м). Трансмиссия 6-ступенчатая АКП. В список оснащения моделей 2011 года входят шесть ПБ, электропривод стекол и зеркал, система курсовой устойчивости StabiliTrak, ксеноновые фары, аудиосистема с чейнджером CD/ MP3.I Bluetooth. Опционально — раздельный климат-контроль, отделка сидений, рулевого колеса и рычага КП кожей, электропривод, подогрев и вентиляция передних сидений, два люка с электроприводом автоматические фары и стеклоочистители, DVD-чейнджер, навигация NavTraffic с сенсорным дисплеем с голосовым управлением, камера заднего вида.

Тип кузова: Кроссовер
Длина: 4707 мм
Ширина: 1849 мм
Высота: 1684 мм
Модельный год: 2010
Количество дверей: 5
Количество мест: 7
Привод: Полный
Число цилиндров / расположение: 4/Рядный
Мощность двигателя л.с / оборотах: 182/7000
Рабочий объем двигателя: 2398 см³
Крутящий момент / оборотах: 235/4900
Вид топлива: АИ-95
Объем топливного бака: 80 литров
Время разгона до 100 км/ч: 9.5 сек
Максимальная скорость: — км/ч
Расход топлива в городском цикле: 11.6 литров на 100 км
Расход топлива на трассе: 7.7 литров на 100 км
Расход топлива — смешанный цикл: 9.8 литров на 100 км
Тип коробки передач: Автоматическая
Снаряженная масса: — кг
Полная масса: — кг
Объем багажника: — литров
Размер шин: 235/55 R17

Тип кузова: Кроссовер
Длина: 4707 мм
Ширина: 1849 мм
Высота: 1684 мм
Модельный год: 2010
Количество дверей: 5
Количество мест: 7
Привод: Полный
Число цилиндров / расположение: 6/V-образный
Мощность двигателя л.с / оборотах: 264/6950
Рабочий объем двигателя: 2998 см³
Крутящий момент / оборотах: 300/5100
Вид топлива: АИ-95
Объем топливного бака: 80 литров
Время разгона до 100 км/ч: 8.0 сек
Максимальная скорость: — км/ч
Расход топлива в городском цикле: 14.7 литров на 100 км
Расход топлива на трассе: 10.4 литров на 100 км
Расход топлива — смешанный цикл: 12.5 литров на 100 км
Тип коробки передач: Автоматическая
Снаряженная масса: — кг
Полная масса: — кг
Объем багажника: — литров
Размер шин: 235/55 R17

Источник

Comparison — Chevrolet Captiva 2015 — vs — GMC Terrain Denali SUV 2015

The first-generation Chevrolet Captiva offered buyers a lot of car for their money. It was a large, seven-seater SUV with powerful diesel engines and decent off-road capability thanks to its four-wheel-drive system. A facelift in 2011 brought revised looks and simplified the engine line-up down to just a single diesel.
Two models are available: an entry-level, five-seat, two-wheel-drive version and a high-spec, seven-seat, four-wheel-drive one. Although all Captivas are comfortable and well equipped, they don’t lead the class when it comes to efficiency and the range-topping LTZ specification can be quite expensive.

Despite its name, it seemed like the Chevrolet Captiva was merely content as the wallflower of the compact crossover segment. While everyone else boasted head-turning good looks or formidable performance (or both), the Captiva had an available diesel variant and seven seats. Sure, it was enough for a select few to part money for one, but the vast majority of Filipinos passed on it. Well, Chevrolet has finally understood that having a diesel and seven seats maybe good for few, but an updated styling and some spec tweaks are much more important. Enter the 2015 Captiva, a compact crossover that’s now slicker than your average.
While it’s not a real fuel miser, at least it handles tidily. Along with the new engine, the 2015 Captiva receives a re-tweaked suspension. Chevy calls it a soft ride suspension, but it feels firmer than the pre-facelifted version. It sharpens the road manners, but the flip side is the ride isn’t as relaxed as it should be for this class. Bumps get easily transmitted into the cabin which isn’t helped by the less than solid feeling body structure. It doesn’t flop or flip through corners, but the overall experience is still very pedestrian. The steering isn’t as quick and feels rather numb, mainly because it still relies on a non-variable ratio hydraulic assist steering, but at least there’s still good grip. Unlike more modern offerings, it doesn’t have stability control to speak of and this causes the front tires to chirp at full throttle. But at least the torque steer is largely controlled.

Fuel

Engine and Performance

Convenience

Exterior Dimensions

Interior Dimensions

Weights and capacites

Instruments

Power Features

Seats

Suspension

Comfort

Entertainment

Exterior Features

Safety Features

Options

Источник

Comparison — Chevrolet Captiva 2015 — vs — GMC Terrain Denali 2019

The first-generation Chevrolet Captiva offered buyers a lot of car for their money. It was a large, seven-seater SUV with powerful diesel engines and decent off-road capability thanks to its four-wheel-drive system. A facelift in 2011 brought revised looks and simplified the engine line-up down to just a single diesel.
Two models are available: an entry-level, five-seat, two-wheel-drive version and a high-spec, seven-seat, four-wheel-drive one. Although all Captivas are comfortable and well equipped, they don’t lead the class when it comes to efficiency and the range-topping LTZ specification can be quite expensive.

Despite its name, it seemed like the Chevrolet Captiva was merely content as the wallflower of the compact crossover segment. While everyone else boasted head-turning good looks or formidable performance (or both), the Captiva had an available diesel variant and seven seats. Sure, it was enough for a select few to part money for one, but the vast majority of Filipinos passed on it. Well, Chevrolet has finally understood that having a diesel and seven seats maybe good for few, but an updated styling and some spec tweaks are much more important. Enter the 2015 Captiva, a compact crossover that’s now slicker than your average.
While it’s not a real fuel miser, at least it handles tidily. Along with the new engine, the 2015 Captiva receives a re-tweaked suspension. Chevy calls it a soft ride suspension, but it feels firmer than the pre-facelifted version. It sharpens the road manners, but the flip side is the ride isn’t as relaxed as it should be for this class. Bumps get easily transmitted into the cabin which isn’t helped by the less than solid feeling body structure. It doesn’t flop or flip through corners, but the overall experience is still very pedestrian. The steering isn’t as quick and feels rather numb, mainly because it still relies on a non-variable ratio hydraulic assist steering, but at least there’s still good grip. Unlike more modern offerings, it doesn’t have stability control to speak of and this causes the front tires to chirp at full throttle. But at least the torque steer is largely controlled.

Pros
Comfortable and upscale interior
Optional engines offer efficiency and power
MyLink user interface is intuitive and easy to use
Extensive list of optional safety features

Cons
Midrange trims offer fewer standard safety features than competitors
Base 1.5-liter is disappointing all around
Less cargo space behind the back seat than most competitors
Price with options runs higher than average for the class

The 2019 GMC Terrain is another contender for crossover shoppers’ consideration, but its high price and lack of active safety features keep it on the bench for now.

Pros
Handsome exterior shape
Composed ride
Tony Denali trim has luxury bona fides
Smooth 9-speed automatic
Apple CarPlay compatibility

Cons
Part-time all-wheel drive
Diesel adds thousands to bottom line
No more sliding second row
Active safety features cost extra, on all trims

The 2019 GMC Terrain ranked #11 in Compact SUVs. Currently the GMC Terrain has a score of 8.0 out of 10 which is based on our evaluation of 28 pieces of research and data elements using various sources.

Pros
Upscale interior
Spacious seats
Smooth ride
Excellent fuel economy

Cons
Poor rearward visibility
Higher starting price than most competitors

Источник

Chevrolet Captiva vs GMC Terrain Comparison

Captiva safety features: Side Airbag-Front, Driver Airbag, Child Safety Locks, Anti-Lock Braking System, Ebd, Rear Camera, Parking Sensors, Crash Sensor, Engine Check Warning, Tyre Pressure Monitor, Traction Control and Electronic Stability Programe Terrain safety features: Passenger Airbag, Side Airbag-Front, Driver Airbag, Side Airbag-Rear, Child Safety Locks, Anti-Lock Braking System, Ebd, Vehicle Stability Control System, Rear Seat Belts, Seat Belt Warning, Day & Night Rear View Mirror, Height Adjustable Front Seat Belts, Crash Sensor, Tyre Pressure Monitor, Front Impact Beams, Side Impact Beams and Door Ajar Warning The GMC Terrain has higher number of sefety features than Captiva, hence GMC Terrain is more safer than Chevrolet Captiva.

Which Car has more comfort features between Captiva vs Terrain?

Captiva comfort features: Air Conditioner, Power Windows Front, Heater, Adjustable Seats, Accessory Power Outlet, Multi-function Steering Wheel, Cruise Control, Low Fuel Warning Light, Rear Seat Headrest, Keyless Entry and Usb charger Terrain comfort features: Air Conditioner, Power Windows Front, Power Windows Rear, Automatic Climate Control, Heater, Rear A/C Vents, Engine Start/Stop Button, Adjustable Seats, Height Adjustable Driver Seat, Electric Folding Rear View Mirror, Accessory Power Outlet, Power Steering, Multi-function Steering Wheel, Cruise Control, Foldable Rear Seat, Remote Trunk Opener, Low Fuel Warning Light, Rear Reading Lamp, Rear Seat Headrest, Cup Holders-Front, Bottle Holder, Keyless Entry and Centre Console Armrest The GMC Terrain has higher number of comfort features than Captiva, hence GMC Terrain is more comfortable than Chevrolet Captiva.

Источник