Краш-тест WK2 EuroNCAP
Вы можете написать сейчас и зарегистрироваться позже. Если у вас есть аккаунт, авторизуйтесь, чтобы опубликовать от имени своего аккаунта.
Бортжурналы
Jeep Grand Cherokee Trailhawk 2017
Последние записи
Течь расширительного бачка
Эпопея с системой охлаждения!
О замене бачка писал, опишу проблему подробнее, возможно кому-то пригодится.
Из бачка стал уходить антифриз, видимых потёков не было, я напрягся и стал наблюдать.
Смотрел на уровень в бачке после ночной стоянки, система ж должна остыть, давление выровняться. Во время пуска двигателя смотрел на выхлопные газы. Почитал статьи про систему охлаждения, все пишут про прогоревшие прокладки, в общем жуть. Продолжалось это несколько месяцев. Антифриз периодически уходил, а я его подливал. Однажды поднял капот сразу после поездки по городу и вижу блестит коса проводов, которая проходит примерно под бачком. Трогаю её пальцем — палец красный. Думаю вот оно. Начинаю лазить искать. Включил фронтальную камеру на телефоне и засунул телефон под бачок, а там висит капля и дренажная трубка мокрая.
Всё вытер, выровнял уровень в бачке и стал ждать. А антифриз не уходит.
В итоге моих наблюдений оказалось, что на самом дне бачка, в самой его нижней точке, похоже образовалась микротрещина. При езде по городу, когда система охлаждения максимально разогревалась и создавалось максимально высокое давление, бачок начинал течь. Но тёк не сильно, поэтому до утра в подкапотном всё высыхало.
При этом автомобиль 2017 года, какого хрена бачок треснул непонятно.
Поставил новый бачок, заменил на нём крышку, и уже как порядка 2000 км этой проблемы нет. Но фобия осталась и литр антифриза всегда лежит в багажнике.
Всем добра и крепких бачков!
Jeep grand cherokee euroncap
Select one or more vehicles among the following possibilities.
- Make
- Aiways
- Aixam
- Alfa Romeo
- Audi
- Bajaj
- BMW
- BYD
- Chatenet
- CHERY
- Chevrolet
- Chrysler
- Citroën
- Club Car
- Cupra
- Dacia
- Daewoo
- Daihatsu
- Dodge
- DS
- FIAT
- Ford
- Geely Emgrand
- Genesis
- Honda
- Hyundai
- Infiniti
- Isuzu
- Iveco
- Jaguar
- Jeep
- Kia
- Lancia
- Land Rover
- Landwind
- LEVC
- Lexus
- Ligier
- Lucid
- Lynk & Co
- Maserati
- Maxus
- Mazda
- Mercedes-Benz
- MG
- Microcar
- MINI
- Mitsubishi
- Mobilize
- NIO
- Nissan
- Opel/Vauxhall
- ORA
- Peugeot
- Polestar
- Porsche
- Proton
- Qoros
- Renault
- Rover
- Saab
- SEAT
- Skoda
- smart
- SsangYong
- Subaru
- Suzuki
- Tazzari
- Tesla
- Toyota
- Volvo
- VW
- WEY
Jeep grand cherokee euroncap
Select one or more vehicles among the following possibilities.
- Make
- Aiways
- Aixam
- Alfa Romeo
- Audi
- Bajaj
- BMW
- BYD
- Chatenet
- CHERY
- Chevrolet
- Chrysler
- Citroën
- Club Car
- Cupra
- Dacia
- Daewoo
- Daihatsu
- Dodge
- DS
- FIAT
- Ford
- Geely Emgrand
- Genesis
- Honda
- Hyundai
- Infiniti
- Isuzu
- Iveco
- Jaguar
- Jeep
- Kia
- Lancia
- Land Rover
- Landwind
- LEVC
- Lexus
- Ligier
- Lucid
- Lynk & Co
- Maserati
- Maxus
- Mazda
- Mercedes-Benz
- MG
- Microcar
- MINI
- Mitsubishi
- Mobilize
- NIO
- Nissan
- Opel/Vauxhall
- ORA
- Peugeot
- Polestar
- Porsche
- Proton
- Qoros
- Renault
- Rover
- Saab
- SEAT
- Skoda
- smart
- SsangYong
- Subaru
- Suzuki
- Tazzari
- Tesla
- Toyota
- Volvo
- VW
- WEY
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
In the frontal impact, the driver’s inboard seat rail was found to have very nearly broken in two, and was mainly held together only by the threaded steel rod which controls fore-aft adjustment of the seat. The break occurred just at the point where the lower anchorage for the driver’s seat belt attaches to the rail, and is thought to have been caused by the high tensile forces in the belt during the test. As a result, there was additional forward movement of the dummy which contributed to ‘bottoming out’ of the airbag i.e. there was insufficient pressure in the airbag to prevent the driver’s head from making contact, through the fabric of the airbag, with the steering wheel rim. Jeep has investigated the cause of the seat rail failure and cars from VIN 1C4RJFJG4EC139637 have a modified design to prevent such fracture. Earlier cars have not been modified. Although dummy readings were good, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test but, in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as marginal. The Grand Cherokee has an ‘active’ head restraint which senses when a rear-end impact has occurred and moves the restraint forward to minimise the time to restrain head movement. Jeep showed that the system responded in a broad range of accident severities, and the whiplash tests were performed with the system active. Nevertheless, the protection provided against neck injuries in a rear-end collision was rated as marginal.
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Full Width Rigid Barrier
Side Mobile Barrier
Side Pole
Far-Side Excursion
Occupant Interaction
Rear Seat
Front Seat
| Rescue Sheet | Available, ISO compliant  | |||
| Advanced eCall | Available | |||
| Multi Collision Brake | Not available | |||
The passenger compartment of the Jeep Grand Cherokee remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection was good for all critical body areas of both the driver and passenger. Jeep demonstrated that good protection would also be provided to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be an aggressive partner in a frontal collision and it was penalised accordingly. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression. Otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both occupants. In both the side barrier and side pole tests, all critical body areas were well protected and the Grand Cherokee scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was poor. The Grand Cherokee does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection. The Grand Cherokee has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event but lacks a system to prevent secondary collisions.